David Ernest Ingle v. United States

Ninth Circuit

David Ernest Ingle v. United States

399 F.2d 690, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 20, 1968·No. 22763·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, convicted of unlawful possession of stolen mail in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. § 1701, has taken this appeal. He argues persuasively the abstract proposition that the Rules of Criminal Procedure should, in all fairness, grant the right to discover the names of grand jury witnesses and require provision of a transcript of their testimony. The rules simply do not so provide and it is difficult to see how, under the defense he asserted, such provision would have aided appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, convicted of unlawful possession of stolen mail in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. § 1701, has taken this appeal. He argues persuasively the abstract proposition that the Rules of Criminal Procedure should, in all fairness, grant the right to discover the names of grand jury witnesses and require provision of a transcript of their testimony. The rules simply do not so provide and it is difficult to see how, under the defense he asserted, such provision would have aided appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

David Ernest Ingle v. United States, 399 F.2d 690, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

399 F.2d 690 (David Ernest Ingle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related