David Ernest Ingle v. United States
This text of 399 F.2d 690 (David Ernest Ingle v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, convicted of unlawful possession of stolen mail in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. § 1701, has taken this appeal. He argues persuasively the abstract proposition that the Rules of Criminal Procedure should, in all fairness, grant the right to discover the names of grand jury witnesses and require provision of a transcript of their testimony. The rules simply do not so provide and it is difficult to see how, under the defense he asserted, such provision would have aided appellant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
399 F.2d 690, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-ernest-ingle-v-united-states-ca9-1968.