David Earl Ison v. State of Indiana
Opinion
FILED May 08 2017, 5:37 am OPINION ON REHEARING CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court
APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE David Earl Ison Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Carlisle, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana
Ian McLean Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
David Earl Ison, May 8, 2017 Appellant-Petitioner, Court of Appeals Case No. 24A04-1607-PC-1618 v. Appeal from the Franklin Circuit Court State of Indiana, The Honorable J. Steven Cox, Appellee-Respondent Judge Trial Court Cause No. 24C01-1407-PC-630
Altice, Judge.
[1] The State seeks rehearing and asks that we delete footnote three of our opinion.
In that footnote, we erroneously concluded that Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9 contains
a technical error. We agree that rehearing is appropriate and therefore grant
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion on Rehearing 24A04-1607-PC-1618 | May 8, 2017 Page 1 of 2 rehearing to delete the second paragraph of footnote three. In all other respects
the original opinion is affirmed.
Riley, J. and Crone, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion on Rehearing 24A04-1607-PC-1618 | May 8, 2017 Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Earl Ison v. State of Indiana (David Earl Ison v. State of Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.