David E. Jones v. State
This text of 188 So. 3d 911 (David E. Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Jones appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the trial court’s order purports to rely upon portions of the record as the basis for denial, no parts of the record were attached to the order. *912 This defect requires reversal. See, e.g., Waters v. State, 612 So.2d 685 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). As such, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court either attach portions of the record that refute Jones’ claims, or hold an evidentiary-hearing. Id.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 So. 3d 911, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6399, 2016 WL 1573891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-e-jones-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.