David Dwayne Womack v. Justice of the Peace Kenneth D. Sanders

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2024
Docket02-24-00457-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David Dwayne Womack v. Justice of the Peace Kenneth D. Sanders (David Dwayne Womack v. Justice of the Peace Kenneth D. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Dwayne Womack v. Justice of the Peace Kenneth D. Sanders, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00457-CV ___________________________

DAVID DWAYNE WOMACK, Appellant

V.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE KENNETH D. SANDERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 352-358560-24

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant David Dwayne Womack filed his notice of appeal with this court

following his filing of a suit in the 352nd District Court.1

We were informed by the trial court clerk that the trial judge had not signed any

orders in this case. Therefore, it appeared that there is no final judgment or order

subject to appeal, and Womack’s notice of appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.1(a), 27.1(a). Accordingly, we informed Womack of our concern that we lack

jurisdiction over this appeal. We requested the parties to provide us with a copy of an

appealable order and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction if no such order was furnished.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.1 “does not contemplate an appellate

place holder until there is a final appealable judgment.” Ganeson v. Reeves, 236 S.W.3d

816, 817 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, pet. denied). Rule 27.1 does not serve to require

an appellate court to “docket and hold an appeal open until there is an appealable

judgment or order at some future date.” Id.; see Burns v. Burns, No. 12-22-00051-CV,

2022 WL 1483623, at *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler May 11, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Womack did not respond to our letter, and a signed final judgment or

appealable order was not furnished to us. Without such a judgment or order, we have

It appears that, instead of filing a de novo appeal to the county court at law 1

from an October 1, 2024, forcible detainer judgment in Justice Court Precinct 7, Womack filed this suit, as well as a separate suit in Tarrant County Court at Law No. 2.

2 no jurisdiction over his appeal. See Burns, 2022 WL 1483623, at *2. Thus, we dismiss

this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker Justice

Delivered: December 19, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ganesan v. Reeves
236 S.W.3d 816 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Dwayne Womack v. Justice of the Peace Kenneth D. Sanders, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-dwayne-womack-v-justice-of-the-peace-kenneth-d-sanders-texapp-2024.