David D. Glassman, D.B.A. Glassman and Sons v. Roger E. Brassard

First Circuit

David D. Glassman, D.B.A. Glassman and Sons v. Roger E. Brassard

218 F.2d 351, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 21, 1955·No. 4903·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict for the defendant in an action brought in the court below under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1) to recover for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an automobile collision. A careful consideration of the *352 record appendices, the oral arguments, the briefs, and the authorities cited therein, discloses the commission of no error at the trial. Indeed, the appel.lants’ assertions of error are so insubstantial that discussion or even enumeration of them is not warranted.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict for the defendant in an action brought in the court below under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1) to recover for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an automobile collision. A careful consideration of the *352 record appendices, the oral arguments, the briefs, and the authorities cited therein, discloses the commission of no error at the trial. Indeed, the appel.lants’ assertions of error are so insubstantial that discussion or even enumeration of them is not warranted.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

David D. Glassman, D.B.A. Glassman and Sons v. Roger E. Brassard, 218 F.2d 351, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786 (1st Cir. 1955).

Pincite

218 F.2d 351 (David D. Glassman, D.B.A. Glassman and Sons v. Roger E. Brassard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related