David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant

Fourth Circuit

David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant

72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39545, 1995 WL 737455

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 1995

Docket95-7088

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 126 (David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Cuffee v. E.B. Wright, Jr., Chief Warden B. Delbridge, Postal Assistant, 72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39545, 1995 WL 737455 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David CUFFEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.B. WRIGHT, Jr., Chief Warden; B. Delbridge, Postal
Assistant, et al, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1009-2)

David Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cuffee v. Wright, No. CA-94-1009-2 (E.D. Va. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David CUFFEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.B. WRIGHT, Jr., Chief Warden; B. Delbridge, Postal
Assistant, et al, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1009-2)

David Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cuffee v. Wright, No. CA-94-1009-2 (E.D. Va. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39545, 1995 WL 737455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-cuffee-v-eb-wright-jr-chief-warden-b-delbrid-ca4-1995.