David Craven v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

David Craven v. State

DecidedDecember 25, 2014

DocketA14A1664

StatusPublished

This text of David Craven v. State (David Craven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Craven v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 16, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1664. CRAVEN v. THE STATE.

In 2006, David Wayne Craven was convicted of aggravated child molestation, child molestation, and two counts of aggravated sodomy. This court affirmed his conviction. Craven v. State, 292 Ga. App. 592 (664 SE2d 921) (2008). In 2014, Craven filed a pro se “Motion to Vacate a Void Judgment.” The trial court dismissed his motion, and Craven filed this appeal. Because we lack jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal. “A direct appeal does not lie from the denial of a motion to set aside a sentence as void unless it raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Paradise v. State, 321 Ga. App. 371, 372 n.1 (740 SE2d 238) (2013). And a sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (1) (409 SE2d 517) (1991). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that — even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed — the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” (Citations omitted.) von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). In his brief, Craven argues that his convictions must be reversed based upon a flaw in the indictment and failure to prove venue. These are not colorable void sentence claims. See, e.g., id. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and it is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/16/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 16, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1664. CRAVEN v. THE STATE.

In 2006, David Wayne Craven was convicted of aggravated child molestation, child molestation, and two counts of aggravated sodomy. This court affirmed his conviction. Craven v. State, 292 Ga. App. 592 (664 SE2d 921) (2008). In 2014, Craven filed a pro se “Motion to Vacate a Void Judgment.” The trial court dismissed his motion, and Craven filed this appeal. Because we lack jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal. “A direct appeal does not lie from the denial of a motion to set aside a sentence as void unless it raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Paradise v. State, 321 Ga. App. 371, 372 n.1 (740 SE2d 238) (2013). And a sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (1) (409 SE2d 517) (1991). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that — even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed — the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” (Citations omitted.) von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). In his brief, Craven argues that his convictions must be reversed based upon a flaw in the indictment and failure to prove venue. These are not colorable void sentence claims. See, e.g., id. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and it is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/16/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

David Craven v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-craven-v-state-gactapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack