David Conrad Collins v. United States
356 F.2d 406, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193
Opinion
Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is that the arrest and the search and seizure following the arrest were unlawful and that the evidence obtained subsequent to the arrest and by virtue of the search was inadmissible. The second question is the *407 sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Both of the issues raised must be resolved against the appellant and his conviction sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court are
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Conrad Collins v. United States, 356 F.2d 406, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193 (5th Cir. 1966).
356 F.2d 406 (David Conrad Collins v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.