David Conrad Collins v. United States

Fifth Circuit

David Conrad Collins v. United States

356 F.2d 406, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 1966

Docket22683_1

StatusPublished

This text of 356 F.2d 406 (David Conrad Collins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Conrad Collins v. United States, 356 F.2d 406, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is that the arrest and the search and seizure following the arrest were unlawful and that the evidence obtained subsequent to the arrest and by virtue of the search was inadmissible. The second question is the *407 sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Both of the issues raised must be resolved against the appellant and his conviction sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court are

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is that the arrest and the search and seizure following the arrest were unlawful and that the evidence obtained subsequent to the arrest and by virtue of the search was inadmissible. The second question is the *407 sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Both of the issues raised must be resolved against the appellant and his conviction sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court are

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 F.2d 406, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-conrad-collins-v-united-states-ca5-1966.