David Coil v. Warden Brian Williams, et al.

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: February 13, 2026
• Docket: 2:24-cv-00017
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6] David Coil, Case No. 2:24-cv-00017-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. [Docket No. 46] 9 Warden Brian Williams, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline. 12] Docket No. 46. Defense counsel indicates that there is some confusion regarding Plaintiff's 13] positions on discovery and that a meet-and-confer will take place shortly to discuss the issues. See 14] also Docket No. 45 “information” filed by Plaintiff).! For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS 15] the motion to extend. The Court EXTENDS the dispositive motion deadline to March 20, 2026. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: February 13, 2026 18 ZS EE □ Nancy J. Koppe — 19 United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25); ———_____»[{[__ ' The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are 26] prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013). For the sake of clarity, the Court notes that Docket No. 45 is not styled as a motion so the Court 27| does not express an opinion on the issues identified therein and will not issue an order granting any relief based on that filing. Instead, the Court will grant the dispositive motion extension 28] request so that the parties may confer on discovery issues.