David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.

304 A.D.2d 610, 757 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3926

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 2003·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the defendant Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rosenblum, R.), entered May 2, 2001, which, after an inquest on the issue of damages on a cross claim against it, is in favor of the defendant Robert S. DiGiose, doing business as Progressive Mason, and against it in the principal sum of $15,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded against the appellant were adequately supported by the evidence adduced at the inquest (see Wynne v Wagner, 292 AD2d 447 [2002]; Slater v Links at N. Hills, 262 AD2d 299 [1999]; Perma Pave Contr. Corp. v Paerdegat Boat & Racquet Club, 156 AD2d 550 [1989]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the defendant Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rosenblum, R.), entered May 2, 2001, which, after an inquest on the issue of damages on a cross claim against it, is in favor of the defendant Robert S. DiGiose, doing business as Progressive Mason, and against it in the principal sum of $15,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded against the appellant were adequately supported by the evidence adduced at the inquest (see Wynne v Wagner, 292 AD2d 447 [2002]; Slater v Links at N. Hills, 262 AD2d 299 [1999]; Perma Pave Contr. Corp. v Paerdegat Boat & Racquet Club, 156 AD2d 550 [1989]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp., 304 A.D.2d 610, 757 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

304 A.D.2d 610 (David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related