David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.

304 A.D.2d 610, 757 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3926

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 610 (David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp., 304 A.D.2d 610, 757 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the defendant Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rosenblum, R.), entered May 2, 2001, which, after an inquest on the issue of damages on a cross claim against it, is in favor of the defendant Robert S. DiGiose, doing business as Progressive Mason, and against it in the principal sum of $15,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded against the appellant were adequately supported by the evidence adduced at the inquest (see Wynne v Wagner, 292 AD2d 447 [2002]; Slater v Links at N. Hills, 262 AD2d 299 [1999]; Perma Pave Contr. Corp. v Paerdegat Boat & Racquet Club, 156 AD2d 550 [1989]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the defendant Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rosenblum, R.), entered May 2, 2001, which, after an inquest on the issue of damages on a cross claim against it, is in favor of the defendant Robert S. DiGiose, doing business as Progressive Mason, and against it in the principal sum of $15,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded against the appellant were adequately supported by the evidence adduced at the inquest (see Wynne v Wagner, 292 AD2d 447 [2002]; Slater v Links at N. Hills, 262 AD2d 299 [1999]; Perma Pave Contr. Corp. v Paerdegat Boat & Racquet Club, 156 AD2d 550 [1989]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 610, 757 N.Y.S.2d 472, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-chotan-inc-v-natan-ya-enterprises-corp-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack