David Charles Fitts v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

David Charles Fitts v. State

DecidedAugust 15, 2008

Docket06-08-00059-CR

StatusPublished

This text of David Charles Fitts v. State (David Charles Fitts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Charles Fitts v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00059-CR ______________________________

DAVID CHARLES FITTS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 114th Judicial District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 114-2295-07

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Charles Fitts appeals from his conviction for the offense of aggravated assault with

a deadly weapon.1 He was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment and a fine of $10,000.00.

Fitts' notice of appeal was filed March 19, 2008, and the clerk's record was filed March 31,

2008. The reporter's record was due June 19, 2008, and has not been filed. Fitts is not indigent.

Therefore, he is responsible for paying for, or making arrangements to pay for, preparation of the

appellate record. See TEX . R. APP . P. 35.3(a), (b).

On July 18, 2008, we mailed a letter to Fitts' retained counsel, stating that, if we did not

receive information showing that Fitts was making a substantial and tangible effort to prosecute the

appeal by showing either a reasonable attempt to obtain a reporter's record or by filing a brief based

solely on the clerk's record within ten days of the letter, we would dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. Fitts has not contacted this Court. We have also contacted the court reporter and have

been informed that Fitts has not contacted her.

1 This case has been transferred to this Court as part of the Texas Supreme Court's docket equalization program.

2 Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.4;

Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd).

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

Date Submitted: August 14, 2008 Date Decided: August 15, 2008

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI