David Caudle v. Chinling Wu A/K/A Jean Caudle, DCCW Properties, Inc. and Olson Capital Investments, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 1, 2022
Docket05-21-00879-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David Caudle v. Chinling Wu A/K/A Jean Caudle, DCCW Properties, Inc. and Olson Capital Investments, LLC (David Caudle v. Chinling Wu A/K/A Jean Caudle, DCCW Properties, Inc. and Olson Capital Investments, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Caudle v. Chinling Wu A/K/A Jean Caudle, DCCW Properties, Inc. and Olson Capital Investments, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 1, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00879-CV

DAVID CAUDLE, Appellant V. CHINLING WU A/K/A JEAN CAUDLE, DCCW PROPERTIES, INC. AND OLSON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-01519

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Molberg, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III The docketing statement and clerk’s record in this case have not been filed.

By postcard dated October 7, 2021, we informed appellant the docketing statement

in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing

statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further

notice. By letter dated January 28, 2022, we informed appellant the clerk’s record

had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed

appellant to provide, within ten days, verification that he (1) had either paid for or

made arrangements to pay for the record, or (2) is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed the

docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

210879f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DAVID CAUDLE, Appellant On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-21-00879-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-01519. Opinion delivered by Justice CHINLING WU A/K/A JEAN Pedersen, III. Justices Schenck and CAUDLE, DCCW PROPERTIES, Molberg participating. INC. AND OLSON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 1st day of March, 2022.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Caudle v. Chinling Wu A/K/A Jean Caudle, DCCW Properties, Inc. and Olson Capital Investments, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-caudle-v-chinling-wu-aka-jean-caudle-dccw-properties-inc-and-texapp-2022.