David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
CHARLENE DAVID, ROSAMARIA TELEP, : No. 8 MM 2022 JACQUELINE PICKERING, AMY : BRUCKNER, COLLEEN GRAY NGUYEN, : JESSICA GITTENS, TONYA MORROW, : MADELEINE SWEITZER, KERRY MILCH, : JOSHUA FERRIS, AND GARY MINTZ, :
:
Respondents :
: :
v. :
: :
LEIGH CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY : OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN : HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR : FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF : ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, :
:
Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2022, Respondents’ Emergency Application
for Extraordinary Relief Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 726 and Pa. R.A.P. 3309 is hereby DENIED
AS MOOT. See Carter, et al. v. Chapman, et al., 7 MM 2022, per curiam order filed
February 9, 2022 (suspending temporarily the dates for circulating and filing nomination
petitions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets. (David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.