David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 11, 2022·No. 8 MM 2022·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHARLENE DAVID, ROSAMARIA TELEP, : No. 8 MM 2022 JACQUELINE PICKERING, AMY : BRUCKNER, COLLEEN GRAY NGUYEN, : JESSICA GITTENS, TONYA MORROW, : MADELEINE SWEITZER, KERRY MILCH, : JOSHUA FERRIS, AND GARY MINTZ, :

:

Respondents :

: :

v. :

: :

LEIGH CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY : OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN : HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR : FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF : ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, :

:

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2022, Respondents’ Emergency Application

for Extraordinary Relief Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 726 and Pa. R.A.P. 3309 is hereby DENIED

AS MOOT. See Carter, et al. v. Chapman, et al., 7 MM 2022, per curiam order filed

February 9, 2022 (suspending temporarily the dates for circulating and filing nomination

petitions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets., (Pa. 2022).

David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets. (David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 726
Pennsylvania § 726