David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets.
This text of David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets. (David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
CHARLENE DAVID, ROSAMARIA TELEP, : No. 8 MM 2022 JACQUELINE PICKERING, AMY : BRUCKNER, COLLEEN GRAY NGUYEN, : JESSICA GITTENS, TONYA MORROW, : MADELEINE SWEITZER, KERRY MILCH, : JOSHUA FERRIS, AND GARY MINTZ, : : Respondents : : : v. : : : LEIGH CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY : OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN : HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR : FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF : ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2022, Respondents’ Emergency Application
for Extraordinary Relief Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 726 and Pa. R.A.P. 3309 is hereby DENIED
AS MOOT. See Carter, et al. v. Chapman, et al., 7 MM 2022, per curiam order filed
February 9, 2022 (suspending temporarily the dates for circulating and filing nomination
petitions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David, C. v. Chapman, L., Pets., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-c-v-chapman-l-pets-pa-2022.