David C. Frazier v. Honorable Frederick J.R. Heebe

Fifth Circuit

David C. Frazier v. Honorable Frederick J.R. Heebe

825 F.2d 89, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11353

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in David C. Frazier v. Honorable Frederick J.R. Heebe. Read the opinion of the Court — 788 F.2d 1049 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 26, 1987·No. 84-3706·Published

Opinion

On Remand From The Supreme Court of the United States.

Before GOLDBERG, POLITZ, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After a bench trial, the district court rejected challenges to the local district *90 court rules of the Eastern District of Louisiana. We affirmed, Frazier v. Heebe, 788 F.2d 1049 (5th Cir.1986). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, exercising its supervisory authority, reversed. Frazier v. Heebe, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2607, 96 L.Ed.2d 557 (1987). We now remand to the district court for entry of a judgment consistent with the decision and mandate of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand From The Supreme Court of the United States.

Before GOLDBERG, POLITZ, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After a bench trial, the district court rejected challenges to the local district *90 court rules of the Eastern District of Louisiana. We affirmed, Frazier v. Heebe, 788 F.2d 1049 (5th Cir.1986). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, exercising its supervisory authority, reversed. Frazier v. Heebe, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2607, 96 L.Ed.2d 557 (1987). We now remand to the district court for entry of a judgment consistent with the decision and mandate of the Supreme Court.

David C. Frazier v. Honorable Frederick J.R. Heebe, 825 F.2d 89, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11353 (5th Cir. 1987).

Pincite

825 F.2d 89 (David C. Frazier v. Honorable Frederick J.R. Heebe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related