David Brian Neff v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 31, 2019·No. 05-19-00090-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 31, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00090-CR

DAVID BRIAN NEFF, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-82288-2018

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due June 22, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by

postcard dated June 26, 2019, and directed him to file his brief along with a proper motion to

extend time by July 8, 2019. We cautioned appellant that the failure to do so would result in the

appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8(b)(3). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). To date,

no brief has been filed, and we have had no communication regarding this appeal.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether

appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d

708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Mark Rusch,

Presiding Judge, 401st Judicial District Court; Stephanie Hudson; and to the Collin County

District Attorney’s Office.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Brian Neff v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

David Brian Neff v. State (David Brian Neff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)