David Bradley & Co. v. West Bros.

123 N.W. 1021, 85 Neb. 570, 1909 Neb. LEXIS 382
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1909
DocketNo. 15,807
StatusPublished

This text of 123 N.W. 1021 (David Bradley & Co. v. West Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Bradley & Co. v. West Bros., 123 N.W. 1021, 85 Neb. 570, 1909 Neb. LEXIS 382 (Neb. 1909).

Opinion

Rose, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover $300, the price of a comsheller. Defendants had been agents of plaintiff át Wisner, and, according to the allegations of the petition, made themselves liable to plaintiff for the sum stated by delivering a cornsheller to the purchaser thereof in violation of their contract of agency. Defendants admitted the making of the contract, but alleged, among other things, that they complied with all its terms during the time it remained in force, and that they did not violate any of its conditions or provisions. Pursuant to a peremptory instruction at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the jury rendered a verdict for defendants. A judgment of dismissal followed, and plaintiff appeals.

Several rulings of the trial court in admitting and in excluding evidence are assailed as erroneous, but they cannot be reviewed for the reason that the bill of excep[571]*571lions was quashed on motion of defendants at a former session of this court. The pleadings, upon investigation, do not affirmatively show any error in directing a verdict or in dismissing the case, and consequently the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 N.W. 1021, 85 Neb. 570, 1909 Neb. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-bradley-co-v-west-bros-neb-1909.