DAVID BLAKE JOHNSTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
DAVID BLAKE JOHNSTON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D23-13
September 29, 2023
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick P. Mercurio, Judge.
Brett McIntosh and Kevin M. Griffith of Brett D. McIntosh, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
LABRIT, Judge.
David Blake Johnston appeals from the order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse for the postconviction court to address Mr. Johnston's claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion for new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. The postconviction court shall either attach records that refute this claim or hold an evidentiary hearing. We affirm in all other respects.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
KHOUZAM and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DAVID BLAKE JOHNSTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DAVID BLAKE JOHNSTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.