David Bautista-Rodriguez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 14, 2011
Docket14-11-00507-CR
StatusPublished

This text of David Bautista-Rodriguez v. State (David Bautista-Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Bautista-Rodriguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 14, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00504-CR

NO. 14-11-00505-CR

NO. 14-11-00506-CR

NO. 14-11-00507-CR

DAVID BAUTISTA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1283063, 1283064, 1296677, 1296678

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to two charges of fictitious or counterfeit inspection certificate; one charge of tampering with a government record; and one charge of possession of a controlled substance.  In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, on May 13, 2011, the trial court sentenced appellant in each case to confinement for 32 months in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the sentences to run concurrently.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case.  We dismiss the appeal in each case.

In each case, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The trial court’s certification is included in the record in each case on appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).  In each case, the record supports the trial court’s certification.  See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, in each case we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Seymore and Boyce.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Bautista-Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-bautista-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2011.