David Band v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company

545 F. App'x 950
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 3, 2013·No. 12-14402·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a suit under a professional liability insurance policy. Plaintiff Band claims that defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Co., owed him a duty to defend him in a third-party action. Twin City, responding, claimed that the allegations of the complaint in the third-party action failed to assert conduct that fell within the policy’s coverage; to the contrary, such conduct fell within a policy exclusion. The District Court, in an order entered on April 5, 2012, agreed with Twin City and granted its Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Band’s complaint. Band appeals. We affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court in its April 5, 2012, order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Band v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, 545 F. App'x 950 (11th Cir. 2013).

545 F. App'x 950 (David Band v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldberg v. National Union Fire Insurance
143 F. Supp. 3d 1302 (S.D. Florida, 2015)