David B. Cox v. State of Florida

193 So. 3d 23, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4108, 2016 WL 1039136

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

David B.- Cox appeals his judgment of guilt arid sentences for one count of burglary of an occupied conveyance and one count of aggravated assault with a firearm. He .argues that this Court should reverse because:. 1) the State committed a Brady 1 violation in failing to disclose two of its witnesses’ criminal records; 2) the trial court erred in denying his ¡motion for judgment of acquittal on the burglary, of an occupied conveyance:.count;. 3) the, prosecutor made several un-objected to but improper comments, during closing arguments; 4) there were several un-objeeted to evidentiary and procedural errors which cumulatively resulted in fundamental error; and 5) trial counsel’s performance was ineffective. We affirm in all respects, but do so without prejudice for Appellant to raise his Brady violation and ineffective assistance of counsel arguments in a Rule 3,850 motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed.

MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

1 . Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).