David Arrington v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
This text of David Arrington v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (David Arrington v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 25, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00851-CV
DAVID ARRINGTON, Appellant
V.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 08-CCV-037800
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 30, 2009. The clerk’s record was filed on November 19, 2009. No reporter’s record or brief was filed.
On December 31, 2009, this Court issued an order stating that unless appellant submitted his brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before February 1, 2010, the Court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Arrington v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-arrington-v-citibank-south-dakota-na-texapp-2010.