David Annor v. Merrick Garland

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1281 Doc: 63 Filed: 05/22/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

FILED: May 22, 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 23-1281 (A063-838-091) ___________________

DAVID ANNOR

Petitioner

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

Respondent

------------------------------

CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION; REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES

Amici Supporting Petitioner

ORDER ___________________

The court amends its opinion filed March 15, 2024, as follows:

The amended language is on page 7. Previously, the sentence accompanying USCA4 Appeal: 23-1281 Doc: 63 Filed: 05/22/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

the citation to Tinoco Acevedo read as follows:

On review of a particularly serious crime finding, we retain jurisdiction to consider colorable constitutional claims and legal issues, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), which we review de novo, Tinoco Acevedo v. Garland, 44 F.4th 241, 246 (4th Cir. 2022).

The amendment adds footnote 2 to the end of this sentence, and changes the

above-line text to read as follows:

Because Annor was found to be removable as a noncitizen convicted of an aggravated felony, we only retain jurisdiction to consider colorable constitutional claims and legal issues, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)–(D), and we review such issues de novo, Tinoco Acevedo v. Garland, 44 F.4th 241, 246 (4th Cir. 2022).

For the Court

/s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk