David and Wendy Meisenbach Limited Partnership v. Sameer P. Sethi, Sethi Operating Company, and Sethi Petroleum, Limited Liability Company
This text of David and Wendy Meisenbach Limited Partnership v. Sameer P. Sethi, Sethi Operating Company, and Sethi Petroleum, Limited Liability Company (David and Wendy Meisenbach Limited Partnership v. Sameer P. Sethi, Sethi Operating Company, and Sethi Petroleum, Limited Liability Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 27, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00349-CV
DAVID AND WENDY MEISENBACH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellants V. SAMEER P. SETHI, SETHI OPERATING COMPANY, AND SETHI PETROLEUM, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellees
On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-01149-2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia We reinstate this appeal. In June 2015, we abated this case due to the May 14,
2015 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
appointing a receiver in a case involving appellees. Under that order, further action
in this appeal was stayed. In March of 2019, we requested a status update. Counsel
for appellees informed the Court of a new address but did not update the Court on
the status of the receivership or the appeal.
We subsequently conducted an independent review of the federal Public
Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system which shows the receivership associated with this appeal was terminated on August 9, 2017. We then notified the
parties by letter dated May 7, 2021, requesting they inform the Court of the status of
this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would result in the appeal being
dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, no party has
responded.
Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this
appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c); Tex. Ranger Oil Co. v. Alamo Fluids, Inc., 2021 WL
1731795, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 3, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).
/Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
150349F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DAVID AND WENDY On Appeal from the 429th Judicial MEISENBACH LIMITED District Court, Collin County, Texas PARTNERSHIP, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. 429-01149- 2014. No. 05-15-00349-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. Justices Myers and Partida-Kipness SAMEER P. SETHI, SETHI participating. OPERATING COMPANY, AND SETHI PETROLEUM, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered July 27, 2021
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David and Wendy Meisenbach Limited Partnership v. Sameer P. Sethi, Sethi Operating Company, and Sethi Petroleum, Limited Liability Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-and-wendy-meisenbach-limited-partnership-v-sameer-p-sethi-sethi-texapp-2021.