David Allen Turner v. Norman Sprinkle, Botetourt County Inspectors
Opinion
811 F.2d 1505
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Allen TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Norman SPRINKLE, Botetourt County Inspectors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-7637.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 26, 1986.
Decided Feb. 5, 1987.
Before WIDENER, HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
David Allen Turner, appellant pro se.
William L. Heartwell, Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Sprinkle, C/A No. 84-1185 (W.D.Va., June 3, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
811 F.2d 1505 (David Allen Turner v. Norman Sprinkle, Botetourt County Inspectors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.