David Alan Brundage v. State
This text of David Alan Brundage v. State (David Alan Brundage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 27, 2019
No. 04-19-00060-CR
David Alan BRUNDAGE, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-10-12665-CR Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding
ORDER On February 25, 2019, appellant filed a “Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal” requesting that this court dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2. Rule 42.2(a) provides, in part: “The appellant and his or her attorney must sign the written motion to dismiss . . . .” Appellant’s motion is signed by his attorney but not by appellant; therefore, the motion is DENIED for failure to comply with Rule 42.2.
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of February, 2019.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Alan Brundage v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-alan-brundage-v-state-texapp-2019.