David A. Sheffield and Ed J. Cain v. Kevin Wilson
This text of David A. Sheffield and Ed J. Cain v. Kevin Wilson (David A. Sheffield and Ed J. Cain v. Kevin Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Ed Cain and David Sheffield, appellants, appeal the trial court's order denying their plea to its jurisdiction. We must dismiss the appeal.
Appellants' brief was due June 30, 2003. By letter dated July 9, 2003, we notified appellants that the due date for the brief had passed, and that we had received neither their brief nor a motion for extension of time to file it. Citing Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.8, the letter also notified appellants that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasonably explaining their failure to file a brief, together with a showing that the appellee has not been significantly injured by the failure, was submitted by July 22, 2003. Appellants have not filed such a response, nor have they since submitted a brief or a motion for extension of time.
Accordingly, having given all parties more than the required ten days' notice, we dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).
James T. Campbell
Justice
STYLE="font-family: Arial" STYLE="font-size: 10pt">John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David A. Sheffield and Ed J. Cain v. Kevin Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-a-sheffield-and-ed-j-cain-v-kevin-wilson-texapp-2003.