David A. Rodewald v. Nathan P. Chelstrom and Farrah D. Chelstrom

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 10, 2011
Docket03-10-00797-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David A. Rodewald v. Nathan P. Chelstrom and Farrah D. Chelstrom (David A. Rodewald v. Nathan P. Chelstrom and Farrah D. Chelstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David A. Rodewald v. Nathan P. Chelstrom and Farrah D. Chelstrom, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-10-00797-CV

David A. Rodewald, Appellant



v.



Nathan P. Chelstrom and Farrah D. Chelstrom, Appellees



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-003568, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R


PER CURIAM

This interlocutory appeal relates to the trial court's order, granting in part and denying in part appellant David A. Rodewald's request for temporary injunctive relief. The trial court denied Rodewald's request for injunctive relief with respect to appellees' construction of any improvements on their lot but enjoined appellees from obstructing any part of the ingress/egress easement serving both their lot and Rodewald's tract.

On April 18, 2011, Rodewald filed a motion to hold appellees in contempt for violation of the trial court's order. He contends that appellees on numerous occasions have violated the trial court's order by obstructing a part of the ingress/egress easement. On May 3, 2011, appellees filed a response to the motion for contempt. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellant Procedure 29.4(a), we refer Rodewald's motion and appellees' response to the trial court and instruct the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on Rodewald's motion and to grant appropriate relief, if any. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.4(a). Following the hearing, the parties should order the appropriate supplementary clerk's and reporter's records to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than June 30, 2011. In the alternative, the parties should file a status report by that date.

It is ordered May 10, 2011.



Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David A. Rodewald v. Nathan P. Chelstrom and Farrah D. Chelstrom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-a-rodewald-v-nathan-p-chelstrom-and-farrah-d-texapp-2011.