David A. Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 2, 2014·No. 04-14-00237-CR·Published

Opinion

The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00237-CR

David A. RAMIREZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 13-07-11311-CR The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On May 23, 2014, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserted there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Appellant was provided a copy of the appellate record and given a deadline of September 2, 2014 to file a pro se brief. Appellant did not exercise his right to file a pro se brief, and the State’s brief in reply to counsel’s brief is due October 2, 2014.

On September 30, 2014, the State filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file a brief. We deny the motion. We order the State must file its reply, if any, to counsel’s Anders brief by October 13, 2014. Thereafter, the appeal is subject to being set for submission without an appellee’s brief.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of October, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David A. Ramirez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

David A. Ramirez v. State (David A. Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)