David a Maples v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of David a Maples v. Attorney Grievance Commission (David a Maples v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135891 & (3) (6) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DAVID A. MAPLES, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
v SC: 135891
AGC: 0151/08
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motions for appointment of counsel and to strike the defendant’s brief are DENIED.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2008 _________________________________________ p0421 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David a Maples v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-a-maples-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.