DAVIA J. BRADSHAW v. CLINTON B. SESSION JR.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DAVIA J. BRADSHAW v. CLINTON B. SESSION JR.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 2022

Docket21-0942

StatusPublished

This text of DAVIA J. BRADSHAW v. CLINTON B. SESSION JR. (DAVIA J. BRADSHAW v. CLINTON B. SESSION JR.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DAVIA J. BRADSHAW v. CLINTON B. SESSION JR., (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVIA J. BRADSHAW, Appellant,

v.

CLINTON B. SESSION JR., and IBM SOUTHEAST EMPLOYEES’ CREDIT UNION, Appellees.

No. 4D21-942

[May 12, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE2012006285 (44).

Sara Lawrence of Law Office of Sara Lawrence, PA, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Adam B. Swickle of Swickle & Associates, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Clinton B. Session, Jr.

Patrick G. Brugger of Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Miami, for appellee IBM Southeast Employees’ Credit Union.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, FORST, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI