Davey v. Erie Railroad

54 A. 233, 69 N.J.L. 50, 40 Vroom 50, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 24, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A. 233 (Davey v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davey v. Erie Railroad, 54 A. 233, 69 N.J.L. 50, 40 Vroom 50, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 136 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

[51]*51The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

This is a demurrer to a'declaration. The declaration contains two counts. The counts are inartistically drawn and each is .confused by unnecessary amplification, but neither count is sufficiently faulty to sustain a general demurrer.

The first count is based upon the alleged careless management of a locomotive engine by the servants of the defendant, such negligence resulting in hot ashes, burning coals, &c., falling upon the combustible material upon the right of way of the defendant company and setting fire to such combustible materials thereon and then spreading to the standing timber, &e., on the plaintiff’s land.

The second count is founded upon the allegation of negligence in the defendant in the way it kept its roadbed and its adjacent land on the right of way, the averment being that the defendant failed “to keep its said strip, parcel or tract of land * * * free from combustible materials, so that fire should not be occasioned by reason of hot ashes, burning coals * * * falling and settling thereon from oiit of said locomotive engines and to take reasonable care to guard against the escape of fire which might be occasioned thereby.”

These counts each sufficiently charge a duty, and the neglect thereof upon the part of the defendant company. Salmon v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 10 Vroom 299.

It is insisted upon, in the brief of the demurrant, that the declaration does not describe or locate the lands of the plaintiff with sufficient certainty. This may be true, but as no such ground for demurrer is found in the causes of demurrer in the record it is not decided.

The demurrers are overruled,, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sommer v. Public Service Corp.
75 A. 892 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A. 233, 69 N.J.L. 50, 40 Vroom 50, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davey-v-erie-railroad-nj-1903.