Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Daniell

135 Misc. 269, 238 N.Y.S. 21, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 985
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 28, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Parol evidence was inadmissible to relieve the defendant from liability under the contracts signed by him. (Meyer v. Redmond, 205 N. Y. 478.) Although the plaintiff made no motion for the direction of & verdict, and a verdict was directed for the defendant, under section 584 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 215 of the Laws of 1926, the appellate court upon reversal is authorized to render final judgment on the right of the parties. (United Paper Board Co. v. Iroquois Pulp & Paper Co., 217 App. Div. 253; affd., 249 N. Y. 588.)

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint.

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Daniell, 135 Misc. 269, 238 N.Y.S. 21, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

135 Misc. 269 (Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Daniell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Paper-Board Co. v. Iroquois Pulp & Paper Co.
164 N.E. 594 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Meyer v. . Redmond
98 N.E. 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
United Paperboard Co. v. Iroquois Pulp & Paper Co.
217 A.D. 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)