Davey James Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Davey James Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz Commonwealth of Virginia

14 F.3d 596, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5011, 1994 WL 14854

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 1994

Docket93-7170

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.3d 596 (Davey James Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davey James Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz Commonwealth of Virginia, 14 F.3d 596, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5011, 1994 WL 14854 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Davey James REEDY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Chief Judge KOONTZ; Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7170.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

Davey James Reedy, appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz, No. CA-93-735-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Davey James REEDY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Chief Judge KOONTZ; Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7170.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

Davey James Reedy, appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reedy v. Chief Judge Koontz, No. CA-93-735-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F.3d 596, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5011, 1994 WL 14854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davey-james-reedy-v-chief-judge-koontz-commonwealt-ca4-1994.