Daverso v. Romeo

89 A.D.2d 1054, 454 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18336
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 1982·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners appeal from an order of Special Term which denied their application for an order validating their petition for an opportunity to ballot. The failure of the subscribing witness to the petition to date his signature renders the petition invalid (see Election Law, § 6-132; Matter of Sortino v Chiavaroli, 42 NY2d 982). The subscribing .witness’ affidavit which supplied the missing date does not cure the fatal defect since it was filed after the last day provided by law for filing the petition (Matter of Sortino v Chiavaroli, supra). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court, Aloi, J. — Election Law.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daverso v. Romeo, 89 A.D.2d 1054, 454 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

89 A.D.2d 1054 (Daverso v. Romeo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Avella v. Johnson
142 A.D.3d 1111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Stevens v. Collins
120 A.D.3d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)