Davenport v. Wells

3 Iowa 242
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 15, 1856·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Woodward, J.

The rule is, that when the contractor has received the price, he is liable for the highest price between the day of delivery, and either the commencement of suit, or the time of trial, but which of these, it is not necessary now to determine; and as a promissory note or due bill is prima facie evidence of indebtedness, or of having received the price, this case would stand upon that rule. See Cannon v. Folsom, 2 Iowa, 101; Foley v. McKeegan, at the December term, 1855, of this court.

When this cause was before the court at the last term, the statement of facts was ambiguous, and led to the supposition that the tender was made on the 27th of April, the day the due bill was made and was due, in which case the former decision was right.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davenport v. Wells, 3 Iowa 242 (iowa 1856).

3 Iowa 242 (Davenport v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stapleton v. King
40 Iowa 278 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1875)