Davenport v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davenport v. State

108 S.E. 132, 27 Ga. App. 285, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 831

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 12, 1921

Docket12411

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 132 (Davenport v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davenport v. State, 108 S.E. 132, 27 Ga. App. 285, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 831 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial contains reversible error; they all relate to the charge of the court, and the portions thereof excepted to are correct statements of the law applicable to the facts of the case; and if the defendant desired any fuller or more specific instructions, he should have presented to the court a written request therefor.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, no error of law appearing, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial contains reversible error; they all relate to the charge of the court, and the portions thereof excepted to are correct statements of the law applicable to the facts of the case; and if the defendant desired any fuller or more specific instructions, he should have presented to the court a written request therefor.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, no error of law appearing, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 132, 27 Ga. App. 285, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-state-gactapp-1921.