Davenport v. State

77 S.E. 830, 12 Ga. App. 565, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 645
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 2, 1913
Docket4680
StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 830 (Davenport v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davenport v. State, 77 S.E. 830, 12 Ga. App. 565, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Pottle, J.

There was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance, it not appearing that the absent witness whose testimony was desired was with the accused at the time the sale of intoxicating liquor took place. According to the showing made, the witness would have testified, at most, that he was only with the accused a part of the day, and that no sale took place 'in his presence. There were other witnesses in court who it was admitted would testify to the same facts as the absent witness. The guilt of the accused was clearly established, and the testimony introduced in his behalf was mainly negative in character and not inconsistent with guilt. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 830, 12 Ga. App. 565, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-state-gactapp-1913.