Davenport v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davenport v. State

594 So. 2d 835, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2208, 1992 WL 35179

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 1992

DocketNo. 91-01036

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 835 (Davenport v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davenport v. State, 594 So. 2d 835, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2208, 1992 WL 35179 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Raymond Davenport appeals a departure sentence imposed after revocation of probation. The reason for the departure was multiple and successive violations of probation and community control. We must reverse because the supreme court has recently made it clear a trial court may not impose a departure sentence for such reason. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

We reverse and remand for resentencing.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Raymond Davenport appeals a departure sentence imposed after revocation of probation. The reason for the departure was multiple and successive violations of probation and community control. We must reverse because the supreme court has recently made it clear a trial court may not impose a departure sentence for such reason. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

We reverse and remand for resentencing.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

594 So. 2d 835, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2208, 1992 WL 35179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack