Davenport v. Piedmont Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Davenport v. Piedmont Mfg. Co.

168 S.E. 394, 169 S.C. 165, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 90

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 27, 1933

Docket13588

StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 394 (Davenport v. Piedmont Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davenport v. Piedmont Mfg. Co., 168 S.E. 394, 169 S.C. 165, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 90 (S.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This action, commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Greenville County, February 16, 1932, by Fred C. Davenport, by his guardian ad litem, as plaintiff, against the defendant, Piedmont Manufacturing Company, a South Carolina corporation, is a suit for recovery of damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the infant, the said Fred C. Davenport, on account of alleged wrongful acts of the said defendant, set out in the plaintiff’s complaint, which complaint will be incorporated in the report of the case. The case was heard November'21, 1932, before his Honor, Judge J. Henry Johnson, on demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendant. From the order of his Honor, Judge Johnson, overruling the demurrer, the defendant has appealed to this Court.

Upon due consideration of the entire record in the case, it is our opinion that Judge Johnson reached the proper conclusion in the case, and for the reasons stated by his Honor in the order issued overruling the demurrer, the exceptions are overruled and the said order affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Beease and Messrs. Justices StabeER and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This action, commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Greenville County, February 16, 1932, by Fred C. Davenport, by his guardian ad litem, as plaintiff, against the defendant, Piedmont Manufacturing Company, a South Carolina corporation, is a suit for recovery of damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the infant, the said Fred C. Davenport, on account of alleged wrongful acts of the said defendant, set out in the plaintiff’s complaint, which complaint will be incorporated in the report of the case. The case was heard November'21, 1932, before his Honor, Judge J. Henry Johnson, on demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendant. From the order of his Honor, Judge Johnson, overruling the demurrer, the defendant has appealed to this Court.

Upon due consideration of the entire record in the case, it is our opinion that Judge Johnson reached the proper conclusion in the case, and for the reasons stated by his Honor in the order issued overruling the demurrer, the exceptions are overruled and the said order affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Beease and Messrs. Justices StabeER and Bonham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E. 394, 169 S.C. 165, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-piedmont-mfg-co-sc-1933.