Davenport v. Johnson
This text of Davenport v. Johnson (Davenport v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6513
TRAVIS L. DAVENPORT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER JOHNSON, Boothworker,
Defendant - Appellee, and
REESE ROBBINS, Col. Head of Securities; LIEUTENANT SHELL, Shift Commander; LIEUTENANT JONES; MAJOR ALLEN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. W. Curtis Sewell, Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-810-A)
Submitted: June 25, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis L. Davenport, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Fletcher Rennie, IV, COWAN & OWEN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Travis L. Davenport appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Davenport v. Johnson, No. CA-00-810-A (E.D.
Va. Mar. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davenport v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-johnson-ca4-2002.