Davenport v. Gruber

Oregon Supreme Court

Davenport v. Gruber

847 P.2d 408, 315 Or. 641, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 38

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1993

DocketCC 88-3702; CA A61071; SC S39240

StatusPublished

This text of 847 P.2d 408 (Davenport v. Gruber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davenport v. Gruber, 847 P.2d 408, 315 Or. 641, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 38 (Or. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

review dismissed as improvidently allowed March 25,1993

Leonard DAVENPORT and Katie Davenport, husband and wife, Respondents on Review, v. Matthew GRUBER and Alice Gruber, husband and wife, Petitioners on Review.

Michael J. Bandonis, of Minor & Boone, P.C., Newport, filed the response and argued the cause for respondents on review.

David B. Williams, Lane County Office of Legal Counsel, Eugene, filed a brief in behalf of amicus curiae Association of Oregon Counties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

review dismissed as improvidently allowed March 25,1993

Leonard DAVENPORT and Katie Davenport, husband and wife, Respondents on Review, v. Matthew GRUBER and Alice Gruber, husband and wife, Petitioners on Review.

Michael J. Bandonis, of Minor & Boone, P.C., Newport, filed the response and argued the cause for respondents on review.

David B. Williams, Lane County Office of Legal Counsel, Eugene, filed a brief in behalf of amicus curiae Association of Oregon Counties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 P.2d 408, 315 Or. 641, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-gruber-or-1993.