Davenport v. Doady

3 Abb. Pr. 409
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Abb. Pr. 409 (Davenport v. Doady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davenport v. Doady, 3 Abb. Pr. 409 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

Opinion

Gould, J.

stating his findings as to amount, &c., of plaintiff’s claim,

I find that Ira S. Elkins did not on or about February 17, 1855, recover a judgment in the Marine Court of the City of New York against the plaintiff in this action .for any amount whatever.

I further find that the instrument offered by the defendant in this action, purporting to be an execution issued out of the Marine Court, on a judgment in favor of Ira S. Elkins against Robert H. F. Davenport, was not an execution, but was void, for the reason that the same was not signed by the clerk of the Marine Court; and that the same is no protection to the defendant because he had notice that the said paper purporting to be an execution was issued when there was no judgment against the defendant named in such pretended execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrick v. Solinger
9 Daly 149 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Abb. Pr. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davenport-v-doady-nysupct-1856.