Daven Marqui Allen A/K/A Daveon Marqui Allen v. the State of Texas
This text of Daven Marqui Allen A/K/A Daveon Marqui Allen v. the State of Texas (Daven Marqui Allen A/K/A Daveon Marqui Allen v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00539-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
DAVEN MARQUI ALLEN A/K/A DAVEON MARQUI ALLEN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 329TH DISTRICT COURT OF WHARTON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
The cause is before the Court on its own motion. On October 30, 2024, appellant
filed a pro se notice of appeal attempting to appeal a judgment of conviction for capital
murder in trial court case number 23436 in the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.03. Subsequently, appellant’s appointed counsel
filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court granted. Pursuant to a plea bargain,
appellant thereafter pleaded guilty to murder. See id. § 19.02. We now dismiss the appeal
for want of jurisdiction.
The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right of appeal states that the case is a
plea bargain, appellant has no right of appeal, and appellant has waived the right of
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On April 1, 2025, we ordered appellant’s counsel
to review the record and determine whether the certification was correct. On April 2, 2025,
appellant’s counsel advised the Court that the certification was correct and we do “not
have jurisdiction to hear an appeal in this matter.”
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.
See id. R. 25.2(d), 37.1, 44.3; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005); Torres v. State, 493 S.W.3d 213, 215 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2016, no pet.);
Pena v. State, 323 S.W.3d 522, 525–26 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2010, no
pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
JAIME TIJERINA Chief Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 17th day of April, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daven Marqui Allen A/K/A Daveon Marqui Allen v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daven-marqui-allen-aka-daveon-marqui-allen-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.