DAVELLA v. McDonough

940 So. 2d 1267, 2006 WL 3153448
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 2006·No. 1D06-0403·Published

Opinion

940 So.2d 1267 (2006)

Robert DAVELLA, Petitioner,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 1D06-0403.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2006.

Robert Davella, pro se, Petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Alexandria Walters, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the trial court's orders (1) denying his petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a forfeiture of gain time in his prison disciplinary proceeding and (2) imposing a lien on his inmate trust account to cover court costs and fees. Because the trial court afforded petitioner due process of law and did not depart from the essential requirements of law when it denied his petition for a writ of mandamus, we deny that portion of his petition for a writ of certiorari on the merits. However, because, as respondent correctly concedes, the action in the trial court was a collateral criminal action as that term is defined in Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003), we grant the petition to the extent it seeks to have the order placing a lien on his inmate trust account vacated. See Cason v. Crosby, 892 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

WEBSTER, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVELLA v. McDonough, 940 So. 2d 1267, 2006 WL 3153448 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

940 So. 2d 1267 (DAVELLA v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cason v. Crosby
892 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Schmidt v. Crusoe
878 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Richardson v. State
940 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)