Davella v. Davella
This text of 8 A.D.3d 424 (Davella v. Davella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated May 9, 2003, which denied his motion, inter alia, to set aside a stipulation of settlement entered into between the parties on December 5, 2001.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff and the defendant were married on September 21, 1990. On December 5, 2001, they executed a stipulation of [425]*425settlement subsequent to the commencement of an action for a divorce (hereinafter the stipulation). On December 12, 2002, the defendant moved, inter alia, to set aside the stipulation. The Supreme Court denied the motion and the defendant appeals.
A stipulation of settlement which is fair on its face will not be set aside absent fraud, duress, overreaching, or unconscionability (see Christian v Christian, 42 NY2d 63 [1977]; Strangolagalli v Strangolagalli, 295 AD2d 338 [2002]). Here, the defendant failed to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate any grounds to set aside the stipulation. Thus, his motion was properly denied.
The defendant’s contention that the stipulation should have been set aside because of the plaintiffs noncompliance with her obligations under the stipulation is without evidentiary support. Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.3d 424, 778 N.Y.S.2d 313, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davella-v-davella-nyappdiv-2004.