Davega-City Radio, Inc. v. Randau
This text of 166 Misc. 246 (Davega-City Radio, Inc. v. Randau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Injunction pendente lite denied. A secondary boycott, as is here presented, prosecuted by pickets carrying signs denouncing plaintiff as an advertiser in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, the employees of which are on strike, is within the very broad definition of the term “ labor dispute ” made in section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act, particularly subdivision 10, paragraph (c), which extends to “any * * * controversy arising out of the respective interests of employer and employee regardless of whether or not the disputants stand in the relation of employer and employee.” (Manhattan Steam Bakery, Inc., v. Schindler, 250 App. Div. 467.) That being so, it follows that the jurisdictional requirements of section 876-a (supra) must be applied; and since such are not supplied by the complaint the court is under the express prohibition of subdivision 1 of said section of issuing any injunction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 Misc. 246, 1 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davega-city-radio-inc-v-randau-nysupct-1937.