Davante Conway v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 18, 2020
• Docket: 14-19-00742-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 18, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00742-CR

DAVANTE CONWAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1518250

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Davante Conway appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Tex. Penal Code § 29.03(a)(2). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief concluding the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant accompanied by a copy of the appellate record. Appellant was advised of his right to file a pro se response to the brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days have passed, and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Hassan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).