Dausman v. Kurtz
94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18471
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1983
StatusPublished
This text of 94 A.D.2d 974 (Dausman v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dausman v. Kurtz, 94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18471 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated at Special Term, Tenney, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Tenney, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dausman-v-kurtz-nyappdiv-1983.