D'Aurio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

D'Aurio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

230 A.D. 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 866 (D'Aurio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D'Aurio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 230 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company for permission to amend its motions made after rendition of verdict, or, in the alternative, under section 459 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order rendering judgment for said defendant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompldns, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion of defendant The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company for permission to amend its motions made after rendition of verdict, or, in the alternative, under section 459 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order rendering judgment for said defendant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompldns, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daurio-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-nyappdiv-1930.