Dauphinais v. Stevens

488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 334, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 856
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1985
Docket2482
StatusPublished

This text of 488 A.2d 102 (Dauphinais v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dauphinais v. Stevens, 488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 334, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 856 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the amendment of the answer during the trial, and its factual findings are not clearly erroneous.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 334, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dauphinais-v-stevens-connappct-1985.